Friday, October 17, 2014
In today's business climate the connected customers are seen as people who are highly educated and technologically social and mobile. A study was commissioned by Kitewheel and was conducted by the independent research firm Strategic Marketing Research, Inc. in 2014 to study ongoing efforts by companies to reach their connected customers individually. The respondents to the study included 382 US
Friday, October 10, 2014
There has been some interesting work done by Dr. Daniel Kahneman, a professor at Princeton University in the area, behavioral economics. Dr. Kahneman received the Nobel Prize in 2002 for his work in economic sciences. One of the phenomenons that he has written about, and which has been given much attention is the peak – end rule. This rule provides some excellent guidance for building customer loyalty.
In essence, the rule explains how experiences are judged with the primary focus being on intensity of emotions at their peak moments coupled with the endpoint or resolution of customer experience. What is research has pointed out is the most positive or negative emotional intensity. In the end resolution of the service experiences have a disproportionate influence on the overall experience of the customer.
What makes this insight of Dr. Kahneman particularly attractive is that when we identify the customer’s peak moments during the customer experience and then focus on how the service experience ends we will create the most impact on how the customer feels about overall experience. When these moments from managed the company can plan on increasing the lifetime value of its customers.
Thus, there are two areas that must be managed well; namely, (i) the careful identification of the customer’s peak moments (those moments with maximum intensity of emotions) and (ii) the last touch point of the service experience (the last actions that occur before the experience ends). Many companies forget the importance of the closing experience. Even though there have been many very positive aspects with the customer during the customer contact, the manner in which the call ends can negate much of the goodwill and loyalty that was created through the service experience.
The bottom line of this neuroscience approach to customer loyalty is that we now have a way to focus on those aspects of the customer’s experience which will have the greatest impact on the overall memory of the customer experience and hence should increase our ability to create and sustain loyalty.
Saturday, August 30, 2014
A study of 1500 US consumers between the ages of 18 and 65, was conducted by the Marketing Store in partnership with research vendor IPSOS. The report was published August 26, 2014. The study was titled “Living Loyal” and it focused on customers who participated in loyalty programs for travel and retail. The categories considered for this study included hotels, retail women's apparel, supermarkets, airlines, and retail sporting goods. For more detailed information, the report can be found on the internet.
There were general findings from the study that support current knowledge about the retail market. In particular, the study found that customers have on average 10 loyalty cards. Of equal importance was the finding that nearly 2/3 of the customers indicated that being loyal to a brand is not particularly important.
One of the key findings of the study was that men and women approach loyalty from a different perspective. One of the most important aspects of investigating men and women separately was the strategic implications that can be drawn from the differences when it comes to designing loyalty progams.
The study found that men see loyalty primarily as a matter of honor or commitment. Loyalty from a man's point of view relates more to the organization than to individuals. It's as if the man is signing up to join a team. Men often use logos on their apparel as a way of identifying themselves with a privileged group (those who wear products with the same logo) thus demonstrating their loyalty.
Women on the other hand, attached loyalty more to individuals within organizations. Women appear to look for highly personalized communications with an individual or individuals within the company. While trust is not a concern for men, trust and devotion are particularly important for women.
When these differences are considered, the loyalty programs for men should aim at identification of the brand with some sort of membership that would suggest some type of exclusivity. On the other hand, the loyalty program for women should be designed to create some form of one-to-one communication between the company and the individual.
The bottom line is that loyalty programs that include both men and women must consider the way that men and women view loyalty. Even though many companies see the marketplace from a unisex perspective, genetics and chemistry demonstrate that differences do exist between sexes. The companies that recognize these differences and develop their loyalty programs with these differences in mind will win.
Monday, July 28, 2014
A recent report published by the Aberdeen Group presents some interesting statistics regarding the value of customer analytics. The author of the report was Omer Minkara. Perhaps one of the most impressive statistics that was presented in the report indicated that the average year-over-year increase in customer lifetime value was 7.6% for those organizations that invest in customer analytics. The other side of the coin is that the organizations that do not invest in customer analytics see a lifetime value declined in customer lifetime value by 4.3% year-over-year.
There were a number of other specific statistics that have additional impact. They are noted below.
1. The number of positive mentions through social media channels was 14.6% for those who invest in customer analytics and 2.9% for those who do not.
2. The cross sale an upsell revenue was 11.6% for those with customer analytics versus
negative 2.3% for those who do not.
3. Annual company revenue increased 10.5% for those with customer analytics versus 3% for those who do not.
4. The return on marketing investments was 8.3% for those with customer analytics versus 4.9% for those who do not.
5. The improvement in average cost per customer contact was 5.1% for those with customer analytics versus an increase in cost per customer contact of 1.7% for those who do not.
These statistics developed by the Aberdeen group are amazing. To see the dramatic difference between those companies who participate in customer analytics and those that do not paint a picture that is hard to ignore. Even if the sample size and rigor of the analysis that led to these statistics is even close to being true, one would wonder why companies are not jumping on the bandwagon of customer analytics. Of course, the challenge that most companies face is how to acquire personnel with the analytic skills that will lead to the kind of statistical performance noted in the Aberdeen Group report.
There is a new book published through the Harvard business review press titled “Keeping Up with the Quants” written by Thomas Davenport and Jinho Kim. It is an introductory guide to understanding and using analytics in business. This book complements the report noted above and gives further justification for the use of analytics.
The bottom line is the statistical improvement in performance that is consistently demonstrated by companies using customer analytics compared to those who do not is no longer questionable. Companies must learn how to take advantage of customer analytics. Those companies, who either do not want to learn how to use customer analytics or don't know how, will find themselves at a distinct disadvantage in the marketplace.
Saturday, July 12, 2014
The results of the 2014 State of Multichannel Customer Service Survey have been released. The same parameters of time and speed-of- answer are still prominent. The survey sampled responses of 1,000 U.S consumers and noted the following statistics which are consistent with past data:1. The most important aspect of good customer service experience is “getting my issue solved quickly”. (41% of responses)
2. The second most important was “getting my issue resolved in a single interaction”. (26% of responses)
These results have been consistent for more than 20 years; however, it is worthwhile to note the magnitude of the percentages as a way to gauge the impact of time on the overall experience. The impact of not meeting the customer expectations for timeliness can be seen in the additional responses.65% of the respondents indicated they have left a brand over a poor customer experience. The reasons that they listed are:
1. Making multiple contacts for the same reason (47%)
2. Transferred from agent-to-agent (43%)
3. Poor communication skills (poor manners) (37%)
There were a number of write-in responses that were the result of language difficulties.Social Media Impact
Social media impact was considered on the survey and some interesting results were obtained. The survey results indicated that 84% of those responding used search engines to try to resolve their customer service questions and more customers use the social media to give positive responses (52%) than to complain (35%). The impact of social media can be seen by the high percentage of customers who are now using social media to get assistance. These statistics suggest that companies should give significant attention to their web sites. Satisfaction can be driven from the web site as well as through making contact with an agent.
The bottom line from this survey is that time to resolve customer issues remains at the top of the list. The second takeaway is that speed alone is not the answer. A quick answer that does not resolve a customer problem will not be viewed positively by the customer and will cost the company additional money and resources to eventually resolve the problem. One of the best management strategies used is to “kill the call.” By killing the call the company is saying spend enough time to get the problem resolved. It makes no sense to deal with a customer without getting a resolution. A call back from the customer is expensive and does not create satisfaction. The objective of each transaction between the company and the customer should yield two outcomes; namely the problem should be resolved and the customer concern should be alleviated. In other words, fix the problem and fix the customer. Of these two, fixing the customer is more important.The social media component takes on equal importance based on its pervasiveness into our customer culture. Whereas we would have been surprised if 20% would have used a search engine to resolve a problem 25 years ago, the percentage of customers with access to the internet today puts a high level of importance on the performance of the company website. It can be as dissatisfying for a customer to have difficulties on the website as talking to an agent. The business of customer service just got a bit more complicated.
Friday, June 27, 2014
Tobin Lehman of New North poses an interesting question. He looks at both loyalty and retention and sees two very different pictures. It is worth noting since both concepts are important but play very different roles with respect to customers.
Loyalty looks at building a relationship between a business and its customers. For this reason, loyalty is a proactive program that seeks to say, as Mr. Lehman puts it, "scratch my back, I'll scratch yours." The point is that a loyalty program should be designed to reward customer behaviors that are in line with the company’s products and services. The administration of these rewards essentially builds those customer actions into habits that encourage the customer to return.
On the other hand, retention is about customer preservation. Once a customer becomes disillusioned with a company they will seek other sources for the products and services provided. Many companies will offer customers who are the brink of departure discounts to salve the wounds that created the desire to depart and look for greener pastures. Customer preservation comes from customer education. Customers often see alternative sources when they lose sight of the value proposition that the company is offering. The primary objective of customer retention should be education of the customers.
The bottom line is that both loyalty and retention are equally important concepts that every business needs to manage. A strong loyalty program can bring in and create new customers. A strong retention program will keep those customers. The question that every company needs to ask is how well am I my managing both loyalty and retention.
Saturday, May 24, 2014
An interesting article written by Harvey Schachter dated May 4, 2014 points out the conundrum that we often face when reviewing customer satisfaction. Many people believe that if you focus on customer satisfaction success will follow. Mr. Schechter points to some of the research by Timothy Keiningham which shows this relationship between customer satisfaction and spending is simply not true. He points out that the relationship between customer satisfaction and customer spending behavior is actually very weak. Quoting Mr. Keiningham “yes, the relationship is statistically significant, but it is not very managerially relevant.”
The article points to three factors which should be considered when evaluating customer satisfaction.
1. The first factor in customer satisfaction is low price. Unfortunately, greater satisfaction gained by lower prices is not sustainable and should not be considered a long-term strategy.
2. The second factor to consider is the size of the organization. He points out that companies with a lesser market share may, in fact, have higher customer satisfaction scores. An example would be that Burger King and Wendy's typically have higher satisfaction scores that McDonald's. The point he is making is that as a company becomes larger the customer base becomes more diverse and it becomes more difficult to keep everyone satisfied.
3. The third factor which is often overlooked is that single brand loyalty is no longer dominant in today's market. When a company shares loyalty with other brands in the market, the better metric is to have your product or service as first choice. This will likely be a better measure of your performance than the customer satisfaction score by itself.
The bottom line is the customer satisfaction is not as simple as it used to be. No longer are customers uniquely loyal to only one brand. An example noted in the article is a study of the hotel industry by Deloitte that found that about 50% of spending by hotel guests does not occur with their preferred hotel brand. Certainly, it is important to maintain customer satisfaction, but the satisfaction scores by themselves are not sufficient to ensure sustainability and growth.
It is important to understand the basis of your satisfaction scores. You may want to consider how your product or service ranks in the choices be made by your customers when they are spending before you sit back and think that all is well because your satisfaction scores are high.